Fallen soldiers remembered as devoted fathers, heros

Eight American soldiers were killed in a 12-hour standoff on saturday. This is the 2nd largest fatality attack since July. The soldiers were stationed in eastern Afghanistan near a base which held 300 Taliban. This region is called a Taliban stronghold and the soldiers knew this was where they would be stationed. Military analysts state that troops were planning for this attack for days and American troops in this region are merely outnumbered. Family members spoke on behalf of the fallen men. The father of Stephan Mace, a soldier killed in the attack, shares that his son was a very good athlete and felt it was his duty to return to Afghanistan despite his knowlege of the danger he would face. Stephan had traveled and lived in Africa for 3 summers where he worked at a vet clinic. It was then that he realized he wanted to enlist in the military. Many others who fell with Mace joined the military to show their devotion to their families. Staff Sgt. Vernon W. Martin left behind his wife and three young children whom he devoted all his time to. Christopher T. Griffin was a very young athlete who lived in a small town. His high school teachers and principal felt the hardship of their recently graduated student's death. Sgt. Michael P. Scusa had always talked about serving in the army. He left behind his wife and 1-year-old son. Other fallen soldiers were remembered for their excitement about life. These soldiers include: Pfc. Kevin Thompson, Sgt. Joshua M. Hardt, Sgt. Justin T. Gallegos, and Sgt. Joshua J. Kirk. All of whom will be remembered for their service and duty to our country.

I believe it is a great act for the U.S. to give a tribute and remember soldiers who die. No matter who it may be or how high in rank they are, each individual is fighting for our country and us as Americans should be greatful for that. This is especially true when a soldier gets killed in an act to serve his or her country. What im wondering, however, is how is it safe for officers to deploy soldiers in heavy Taliban populated areas where attack is a high risk? Of course, it is their duty, but can they be blamed for not having enough troops to defend themselves? In my opinion, more troops should be stationed at bases with higher Taliban threat. The military analysts knew how large the Taliban group was so why wouldn't they send enough troops to that base? Terrorist analysts stated that a similar attack at a base in Wanat, 20 miles from attacked base, should have been a lessons learned experience. I couldn't agree with them more. Why station such loyal U.S. citizens in an area too populated by the enemy for their numbers to defend? This concept does not make sense, but hopefully second time around the military learns a lesson. All in all, I admire the recognition of the fallen soldiers who have fought so bravely for my safety.


http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/10/07/afghanistan.soldiers/index.html?eref=rss_politics